windhoek
The Phoolosopher
I'm actually kind of inclined to think the problem was almost the opposite - trying to do things like they used to. Early digital recordings were made to only a few channels, mixed live. The engineers were typically working closely with the folks who developed the ADCs and the recordings were characterized by a natural sound with incredible dynamic range. Not particularly like the analog recordings from the 70s, especially from labels like DG, which were characterized by too many mics and limited dynamic range. Early digital was at a disadvantage to tape when working that way, and once the more traditional engineers started using it the results were much less impressive.
You might be right. All I know is is I've bought lots of modern pop/rock records over the last ten years and lots of them sound terrible, terribly compressed perhaps; so much so I've more or less stopped buying new records.
Admittedly, part of the problem is my system. The 'bad' records in my collection don't sound that bad through the small Kralk Audio BC-30 bookshelf speakers in my bedroom as the loud compression helps produce a fuller sound from those bass-lite speakers, but those records just sound really bad through my Tannoy Eaton Legacy speakers, speakers which really call for music with great dynamic range to allow the music breathe into the room rather than be rammed into the room with excessive compression.
Thankfully, it wasn't always thus and good sounding records are still out there, and at least one of them is mine