You're catching up, but you're still 100 behind me.
(I just realised its my 500th SACD!) Yeay! :banana:
(I just realised its my 500th SACD!) Yeay! :banana:
You're catching up, but you're still 100 behind me.
I've got 48 SHM SACDs. Can anyone top that?
I've got 48 SHM SACDs. Can anyone top that?
I've got 48 SHM SACDs. Can anyone top that?
The SHM-CD & SHM-SACD formats are a waste of money and sound no better than their original counterparts. The only reason to purchase one is for a particular title that you can't find in the non-SHM format. But watch out for those highly compressed releases...double waste! :yikes
And every one non-surround! I bought a couple SHM SACDs in the early days but didn't impresses. Don't bother anymore.
I just feel the SHM format, in general, is a crock of $hit. That "Super High Material" is supposed to make a difference in the sound quality for the better (so they say) but out of the several that I compared very closely with their non-SHM counterparts, I did not detect a difference what-so-ever.
I'll have 49 in a few days having just ordered Asia Alpha yesterday. And for the platinum SHM CD non-believers I also ordered Brothers In Arms (with the LP versions).
Nope! I've only 2 Camel's "Moonmadness" & Wishbone Ash's "Argus".
I've got 48 SHM SACDs. Can anyone top that?
Enter your email address to join: