Why "BDA"?

QuadraphonicQuad

Help Support QuadraphonicQuad:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

ssully

2K Club - QQ Super Nova
QQ Supporter
Since 2002/2003
Joined
Jul 2, 2003
Messages
3,948
Location
in your face
I see it a lot here...Blu-Ray discs abbreviated as 'BDA'.

Hey Google what is 'BDA"?
"Blu-ray
Disc Association, or BDA, is a group of companies with an interest in the BD formats."


Why not just BD?
 
Blu-Ray Disc Audio

"Blu-ray Audio is a high-definition audio format that uses Blu-ray discs to deliver high-quality sound. Unlike standard Blu-ray movie discs, Blu-ray Audio discs focus exclusively on audio content rather than video. They often include uncompressed audio tracks in high-resolution formats like 24-bit/96kHz or even 24-bit/192kHz, which surpass the quality found on standard CDs (16-bit/44.1kHz)."
 
pretty sure if you're referring to polls it was a way to distinguish between discs that are primarily audio as opposed to discs with primarily video content
 
From what I understood, Blu-ray Audio (BD-A) was SUPPOSED to describe an audio-only disc with zero visual content (Blu-ray Profile 3.0) but it has now been repurposed to describe any disc that contains audio-centric musical content. The Blu-ray Profile 3.0 specification still exists, but I'm not sure if there are any discs that actually use it, as it functions like an Audio CD. There were meant to be audio-only Blu-ray players for Profile 3.0, but again I'm not sure any exist.
 
For the Surround Engineers database, the (evolving) convention is to use "BD-A" to designate a Blu-Ray disc with primarily or exclusively audio content (not counting title & menu screens, still images, etc.) and "BD-V" for concert videos and the like. I find that distinction more informative than awkward--let alone distasteful.

FWIW, here's how Bing AI parses it:
A Blu-ray video disc primarily focuses on high-definition video quality, while a Blu-ray audio disc is dedicated to delivering high-resolution audio, essentially providing a much higher quality sound experience compared to standard audio formats found on a video Blu-ray disc; both formats utilize the same Blu-ray disc technology but prioritize different aspects of media playback - video on one and audio on the other.

Key points about the difference:
Primary focus:
Blu-ray video is primarily for watching movies with high-quality visuals, while Blu-ray audio is solely for listening to music with superior sound quality.

Audio quality:
While a Blu-ray video disc may include high-quality audio options, a dedicated Blu-ray audio disc offers significantly better audio fidelity with support for lossless audio formats like Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD Master Audio.

Disc content:
A Blu-ray video disc contains both video and audio streams, whereas a Blu-ray audio disc only contains audio data.
 
Audio quality:
While a Blu-ray video disc may include high-quality audio options, a dedicated Blu-ray audio disc offers significantly better audio fidelity with support for lossless audio formats like Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD Master Audio.

The problem with AI's claim there is obvious, but hardly unique to it. But that's another topic.
 
Yes, it's simply a way to distinguish between Blu-Ray discs that primarily feature audio-only content such as a multichannel mix of an album, such as the SDE Surround Series or the Rhino Quadio series, and discs that have primary video content accompanied by a multichannel mix which include concerts and other live material (the recent Snarky Puppy releases for example) and documentary and other film-type releases like The Beatles Get Back.

Lots of different entities, things, and concepts share names (like "compression" for example) and acronyms are no different - I think everyone here knows that DV refers to Dutton Vocalion and not beating your wife in the context of QQ, and I think even the smoothest-brained here can understand the delineation we've made between BDA and BDV even if these acronyms haven't been ratified by any international consortium or are shared with some other entity.
 
This is what I think about it:

Unimportant:

- If I want to play the Blu-ray like CD style, that is, without needing a TV/Projector display for the menus and using only the remote control. The name PABD (Pure Audio Blu-Ray) may mean that it is possible to do that.

The most important thing:

- If it is a live concert, I want to know if it is just the music (BDA), even if it has video such as video clips or documentaries. Or if it is the film, video footage of the concert. For example, the initial doubt of the “Tears For Fears / Songs For A Nervous Planet” Blu-Ray.

The primary important thing is knowing the content of the Blu-ray, which we discover by reading about its complete description or in forums like QQ.

The secondary unimportant thing is the nomenclature.
 
Boris Blank -(2024)- Resonance (Atmos) [BDA]
typical of my labeling. All I really need to know is the title. All my rips are categorized in folders by disc type. (DVDA/BD/SACD Surround/etc)
 
Boris Blank -(2024)- Resonance (Atmos) [BDA]
typical of my labeling.
Yep, I do the same. I have my own little codes I add to the title and/or
put in the meta data so I know what I need to know.
Hard earned lesson back from when I first started to rip CD's and do needle drops.
I never added anything beyond the artist, title, and year. Now there are so many times
when I wonder what mastering, mix, etc it is and I have no idea what it is..
 
Back
Top