My thoughts exactly. I listened to almost the entire album last night again (except for the 20-min epic), and it was so incredibly painful!! (especially with that album cover staring me in the face)
Well, IMO, what is worth hearing in "Love Beach" is precisely that 20-min epic! It saves the album!!! Whereas Side One of "Love Beach" has some really embarrassing moments musically and lyrically (both thanks to Mr. Lake as far as I know), Side Two could be with any TOP ELP album. it has some original things in it which were never to be seen again on KE, GL and CP discography.
"Love At First Sight", for instance, has one of the toughest piano lines of Emerson's career, as it's based on Chopin's "Etude Op. 10/1" (and even quotes it at the beginning). Constructed melodies, chords far from the obvious, a subtle acoustic guitar solo by Lake, and a surprising Glockenspiel part by Palmer. So, ears on, eyes closed, by now that ridiculous album cover should be far behind.
"Letters from the Front" is a unique chance to get to hear a jazzy Emerson on a Fender Rhodes, with fantastic GX-1 lines and effects that would anticipate (and maybe surpass) Emerson's "Nighthawks" soundtrack cues.
"Honourable Company" is not that original, of course, it's a kind of a new "Abbadon's Bolero" (which by the way was not that original itself, once it was a kind of a crossing between Ravel and Wendy Carlos). But to me, "Company" has more a colorful (synth) orchestration than Abbadon's.
I could also mention "Prologue/Education": what's in it that is such a shame? In what does it pair with the album cover? In it, I can remember a very atmospheric piano/vocal duet, followed by a powerful, climatic, song structure with good GX-1 solos. For those who like Lake's singing, a must hear.
So I think "Love Beach" is the dead dog everybody loves to beat.
While many punk bands could get away with murder (musically), the idea of "Love Beach" being the apex of mediocrity, and ELP the example of pretentiousness in Rock, just do not give up.
As if rock were to be completely free of disappointing albums had "Love Beach" never existed... As if never before nor after there were cases of good rock musicians being lost and making screwed up records...
If composition, harmony, structure, form, performance skills and even analogue synth-programming count for anything, I'd say "Love Beach" beats the crap out of most acts that were around 1978, like Ramones, The Sex Pistols, and, yes, The ABBAs. Yet in some aspects that album is ELP's biggest shame.
But maybe it's acceptable to say it's harder for an ELP to keep the musical level they once reached than the other acts I mentioned here to keep their own, simply because one can objectively say that, musically, technically, those acts never got as high as ELP (in other aspects I really don't care about, maybe "social", "anthropological" ones, they might have easily surpassed ELP by far). That would perhaps also explain why during the '90s ELP would never ever get close to what they once were in the '70s. Decadence just beats harder those who were once high enough to have a huge fall.
For the record: I lost any interest in whatever KE, GL and CP have been doing during the last 20 years. To me: unambitious, repetitive, boring, past driven, re-re-release driven, "we're only in it for the money" driven. The only things I'd really pay some good bucks for nowadays, regarding ELP, are (1) a full set Cal Jam '74 video and (2) a release of the Quad mix of WBMFTTSTNE with no wow and flutter issues.
Sorry for the long post here, I usually just read the topics. But I think ELP is severely and unfairly punished many times not because it’s truly bad, but because it could never be as good again.