August 4, 1973
The quadrasonic scene
Universal Systems:
One Method Of
Making Incompatible
Systems Compatible
The newest development
in hardware allows you to play discrete and matrix modes.
By Rob Kirsch
COMPATIBILITY in the incompatible world of quadrasonic. This is what the "universal systems" hardware units with their ability to play and receive both discrete and matrix modes in what is probably the most exciting and important development in 4-channel equipment in the past year.
What does the advent of the universal system indicate? For one thing, the buyer of 4-channel tape equipment generally need not concern himself with the discrete-matrix "battle,” as most quadrasonic tape units are discrete. For the buyer wishing to play 4-channel disks today or receive what quadrasonic radio broadcasts are available the meanings are several fold.
The major advantage of the universal system go to the consumer. Purchasing one of these units means he can play discrete disks or matrix records and receive effective results through the flick of a switch. Though many of the universal units do not feature separate switches for CBS's SQ matrix system and Sansui's QS or regular matrix, they do include a circuit which the manufacturer feels is capable of handling both modes. And universal units often include a built-in CD-4 or discrete demodulator. So the consumer can purchase a receiver today and play virtually all quadrasonic disk material available.
The universal systems are also felt by many in the industry to be a bonus to the retailer. He does not have to worry about selling a customer an obsolete product.
For the consumer wishing to receive 4-channel radio broadcasts, the universal system is also an important step. At this moment, none of the seven or eight quadrasonic broadcasting systems have managed to find a dominant and permanent niche in radio.
Matrix broadcasting is, however, by far the most common and the most regular. If a consumer wishes to listen to quadrasonic radio and also listen to discrete disks, the universal unit will allow him to do so.
Perhaps the most important signal being relayed by the advent of universal systems is a kind of unannounced admission by the hardware industry that the three currently popular forms of quadrasonic reproduction are going to be around together for some time to come. Co-existence it not simply a kind word used in trade meetings nor a quote used to prevent in-fighting in the hardware and software business.
It is a fact, and manufacturers and consumers are recog nizing this fact. Discrete, SQ and QS 4-channel systems are all viable systems for the moment and the general feeling is that they will continue to be viable for several years. Many feel it will be far more than several years, and the conversation of one system beating out another system has taken a back seat in many cases to the cause of letting the retailer and the public know that 4-channel is a new dimension in sound and is available now.
What do some of the leading manufacturers have to say about universal 4-channel systems and why are they including them in their lines? What are some of the differences between the universal units? Should the consumer buy one of the "lower end' units retailing at around $300 or is he better off with a unit selling at $800?
Panasonic offers several versions of universal units under its Series 44 line. Some models feature a built-in CD-4 demodulator and all have switches called Quadraplex which are meant to handle both SQ and QS matrix. "Some of our mod els have the CD•4 built in," says assistant general manager of the merchandising division Jeff Berkowitz, "and some are adaptable for this. To us, however, some form of compatibility between the systems is becoming a trend.
"Nobody is looking to or is in a position to force the market and no manufacturer can ignore the outside world. All three types of quadrasonic are available and the consumer has the right to have access to them. There is plenty of software available for both systems and while we back discrete, there is no doubt that matrix is here, both in disk and in broadcasting.
For the moment, we are looking at a dual distribution situation."
Jerry Kaplan, who heads up Technics (Panasonic's hi fi line), agrees with Berkowitz. "We have a unit with built in CD-4 as well as matrix devices. All of us in the industry know what's been going on between discrete and matrix. A year ago, I might have said there was a battle going on. But after looking at the Consumer Electronics Show this year, the topic I saw was how to sell merchandise in 4-channel, not which system was best.
"With a system encompassing discrete and matrix," Kaplan continues, “the dealer can do business today. There is no such thing as obsolescence. If everyone wants to keep talking about a battle then the dealer stands a good chance of losing both stereo and quadrasonic sales. Now he can say to the consumer, 'here's something with discrete and matrix, play what you like on it.' "
Kaplan feels that what he is doing and what many other manufacturers are doing is "taking the doubt away from the consumer. We're telling him that he can have stereo or whatever form of 4-channel he needs. Why penalize the consumer until one system is settled upon? The discrete and matrix systems could ride along together for years."
Bernie Mitchell, president of Pioneer Electronics, agrees with much of what Berkowitz and Kaplan have to say. "We have three units with CD-4, SQ and QS built in," he says, "and we look at the systems with the same eyes as we look at the 33 and 45 disks. Both disks serve different functions and both have been around for years. Maybe the 4-channel systems will follow that same path. I don't know many people who would buy a turntable missing one of these speeds, and I don't really know why a consumer or dealer at this stage of the game would buy a receiver missing a viable capability. These quadrasonic forms could co-exist for years and years and I think the universal systems are the only usable ones.
Pioneer has three models currently on the market which are universal and is planning a fourth, more powerful unit.
"This is the trend as I see it now," Mitchell says. "And to be honest, I'm not going to say that things will ever be completely settled when it comes to one system dominating the others.
SQ is certainly a viable system. They have a lot of records on the market and have shown that SQ broadcasting works. By the same token, CD-4 is gaining more and more strength.
With matrix and discrete we may be looking at two sources that are going to live together for a long time."
Stan Kavan, vice president of planning and diversification for CBS, disagrees somewhat with the need for three systems in a single unit, but does feel the universal concept is a good idea. "In this country, manufacturers don't seem to have the quality problem in matrix," Kavan says.
"Most manufacturers showing all three systems in a single unit are based in the Orient, because there were at one time a series of meetings in Japan in which three decoding characteristics were adapted.
"At the high-end, however, I do feel that universality is a good idea. But the mass market may find they can't accom modate both systems because they can't hold the price points. The fact does remain, however, that both SQ and discrete are viable systems now."
Howard Ladd, who heads up Sanyo's consumer electronic division, believes that "the universal systems importance will depend on the viability of CD-4. At the present, we are placing CD-4 demodulators into one high-end receivers for the man who wants something guaranteed not to be obsolete. But the matrix and discrete systems could either merge or co-exist indefinitely. While I happen to feel that matrix is the best system, I do think it's a good marketing technique to offer all of the systems. I think you will see a lot more companies coming out with universal product."
JVC vice president Bill Kist says his firm offers universal receivers "because this will be the big thing this year with all of the quadrasonic systems viable. The rest of the industry is offering their forms of universality as well, and I think we can take this as an indicator that all 4-channel formats will be around for sometime. I equate the whole thing with the introduction of stereo records followed by FM broadcasting. With the growth of quadrasonic disks, I think you will see a definite evolution into 4-channel broadcasting. Matrix is the dominant form of this type of broadcasting now, though I certainly see a trend to CD-4 which we back.
Steve Perpich, assistant product manager for Marantz marketing, feels that "Marantz has a different approach than the rest of the industry, but we are still offering what we feel is a universal series of systems. All of our receivers are discrete with four amplifiers which can be bridged for stereo. This is our basic concept. Our matrix format is called Vari matrix, which is a synthesizer which synthesizes ambient information off a stereo record and feeds it to the back channels.
"This format decodes both SQ and QS very well as far as we are concerned. What we do have is a pocket on the bottom of the unit connected to a front switch reading SQ decoder.
The consumer can buy this unit and plug it into the bottom of the receiver. He then has vari matrix. It's a universal system but the idea is that the consumer is not locked into two matrix systems.
“When changes come, you can unplug the decoder and put in another one. We don't happen to think that the matrix war is over and we think that in two years you will see product with only one system, be it discrete or a matrix type. If one system wins a race, why have all three in a unit. We are not really universal. We offer more than one system as an option."
The above are not all of the manufacturers offering universal units. Fisher, Harman-Kardon and Onkyo are among others. And all are a bit different in the way the present their universatility. Some offer switches plainly marked CD-4, SQ and QS, some offer just CD-4 and SQ (feeling that SQ can successfully decode QS), some offer a switch marked RM and there are endless variations.
The important point is, however, that systems offering the ability to play more than one type of quadrasonic disk and receive more than one type of quadrasonic broradcast are here.
The ability to play more than one type of disk is becoming increasingly important. Columbia's SQ disks have been on the market for several years now and with Columbia and the various labels using the systems, there are more than 250 SQ records available worldwide. Most of the industry credits CBS with doing a fine job of marketing the 4-channel disk concept to the public and the label and other labels using the system have so much top flight talent on them that the system cannot be shrugged off.
By the same token, discrete disks are gaining strength in number and acceptance everyday. RCA has been releasing Quadradisks at the rate of seven or eight a month, and the WEA group has some 24 disks ready for release. Several other major labels have yet to make a decision, but the mere size of RCA and the WEA group is enough to make discrete an important force in the market.
Not to be ignored is the Sansui QS disk system. A number of labels, including A&M and Ode and Project 3 have product available in QS, and more licensees are continually being signed. The QS system is a viable matrix system there are a number of popular disks available.
The consumer, therefore, might very well have large libraris of music in all three systems. Even if the industry should by some miracle agree on a standard system tomorrow, the consumer would still have this library. The feeling is, why deprive the consumer? Let him play what he has and continue to buy what he wants without fear of obsolescence. Quadrasonic is finally gaining the ground predicted for it several years ago, so why, many in the industry appear to be asking themselves, should we let fighting get in the way?