Jethro Tull "Living in the Past" CD/Blu-Ray Deluxe Edition out Summer 2025!

[srbjab]

I agree - a missed opportunity. Aside from the 'completist' attraction of owning every bookset reissue, having the surround tracks updated to Atmos on the blu-ray would have been the most compelling reason for JT fans who have already purchased all the previous reissues to get this. For me, the amount of previously unreleased or newly remixed material just isn't that compelling for the price. Maybe the packaging will be over the top luxurious? I do fully expect the JT catalog to be revisited in Atmos at some point, and this would have been a perfect sampler for it.

 

[newslane]

In this interview, Ian says that a deluxe edition of Under Wraps is under consideration, with drums replaced.

 

[key_wiz]

And then in 1989 "everyone" decided that they were a heavy metal band and not a hippy band after all... for some reason.

“Hard Rock/Metal” was the name of the category. 35 years later and people are STILL complaining about this??

 

[fizzywiggs41]

“Hard Rock/Metal” was the name of the category. 35 years later and people are STILL complaining about this??

Weren't they all 'Mullet Hair Bands' by that time.

 

[key_wiz]

Weren't they all 'Mullet Hair Bands' by that time.

1989 was the first year the Grammys had a "Hard Rock/Metal Performance, Vocal or Instrumental" category. So the metal heads were all excited that their music was finally going to be recognized and the conventional wisdom was that the award would/should go to Metallica for "...And Justice For All".

The other nominees that year were Jane's Addiction, Iggy Pop and AC/DC.

So no. Not really a whole lotta mullets among that bunch.

After the controversy that year, the academy split the award into two --- separate Hard Rock and Metal Performance categories, the latter of which Metallica has gone on to win numerous times.

Of course, Tull arguably isn't "hard rock" either. But the now-legendary-tale that they won for "Heavy Metal" simply isn't 100% accurate. And there have certainly been worse snubs and oversights in the history of the Grammys (IMO).

But Hell Hath No Fury Like a Heavy Metal Music Fan Scorned, apparently.

 

[Quadlover]

There should have been a Progressive Rock category.

 

[LuvMyQuad]

There should have been a Progressive Rock category.

WIth all the crap they have on Sirius radio, there is no prog rock channel. Unforgivable.

 

[SomethingAnything]

I personally disagree with the above comment that Tull are/were a hippy band. If I could only choose between hard rock and hippy, I'd put them in hard rock. But really, they probably defy category. They were blues rock, then rock with prog elements, then folk rock, then... All over the place really, while still maintaining their own unique sound. But never throughout all of their albums, did I ever think of them as hippy.

 

[Ranasakawa]

I agree - a missed opportunity. Aside from the 'completist' attraction of owning every bookset reissue, having the surround tracks updated to Atmos on the blu-ray would have been the most compelling reason for JT fans who have already purchased all the previous reissues to get this. For me, the amount of previously unreleased or newly remixed material just isn't that compelling for the price. Maybe the packaging will be over the top luxurious? I do fully expect the JT catalog to be revisited in Atmos at some point, and this would have been a perfect sampler for it.

The major of the songs on the original album were probably recorded on 8 track machines or even 4 track for the earlier stuff. I don't think Atmos would have much improved surround experience for these particular songs.
I have all the Tull boxes and have been very impressed with the content and fantastic books

 

[JulesRules]

Thanks Jeremy

Did I miss something?

But the now-legendary-tale that they won for "Heavy Metal" simply isn't 100% accurate.

But the flute is a heavy metal instrument!