It is a well known fact that girls cannot resist a well dressed man with a Wurlyscope.
If there will be a second release put me on the want list please.
I'm sure there are others too.
It is a well known fact that girls cannot resist a well dressed man with a Wurlyscope.
A great pickup line that works every time is “Hey baby, do you wanna go back to my swingin’ bachelor pad and check out my Wurlyscope?” They can’t resist.
I cobbled together two videos of the Wurly using SQ test tones generated by Malcom Lear's program with the Involve SQ and the Space & Image Composer.
First is 8-position, then X-axis, y-axis, and z-axis
I forgot to center the output balance pots on the S&IC before filming, so the center front tone is little off center. I almost never power it on since I haven't got it recapped yet, didn't want to do a retake. Also, just ignore TV and awkward breathing in the background.
Involve SQ
Space & Image Composer
I would say both of them lock solidly and accurately direction wise, but the Involve seems to have more ambient sound from the opposing channels, the Tate only sounds awkward with certain stereo material with the seperation pot all the way up. Btw I just realized it was at about 85% in the video. The Wurly also seems to confirm this.What's your opinion of these results between the two (does the S&IC lock on more accurately for most parts?)
I used 1% precision resistors through all circuits to get accurate measurements.I would say both of them lock solidly and accurately direction wise, but the Involve seems to have more ambient sound from the opposing channels, the Tate only sounds awkward with certain stereo material with the seperation pot all the way up. Btw I just realized it was at about 85% in the video. The Wurly also seems to confirm this.
I wonder if i should start another thread about the AFV JCQS-440
Thank you doity!Might as well at this point. This thread had a good run. It’s only right that the Wurlyscope have its own thread .
Maybe one of the mods can move my post over to hereYou can now follow my JCQS-440 A.F.V. on a new thread:
https://www.quadraphonicquad.com/fo...440-a-f-v-also-known-as-the-wurlyscope.30745/
Thank you all and let's continue the adventure together!
Maybe a Copy & Paste is simplerMaybe one of the mods can move my post over to here
Thanks for the video, but I'm having trouble interpreting the results from your description of the test tones. I guess the the eight positions are supposed to be C,R,Rc,Rb,B,Lb,Lc,L (although I'm not sure I can identify them all) but what do you mean by the x, y and z axes in SQ?First is 8-position, then X-axis, y-axis, and z-axis
Yes, the first part is fr, cr, br, cb, bl, cl, fl, cf. The next three rotation tones are in SQ, but I don't really know exactly what they are doing, would have to ask Malcom since he created the program that generated these tones. They also look cool on x/y mode on a standard 2ch oscilloscope.Thanks for the video, but I'm having trouble interpreting the results from your description of the test tones. I guess the the eight positions are supposed to be C,R,Rc,Rb,B,Lb,Lc,L (although I'm not sure I can identify them all) but what do you mean by the x, y and z axes in SQ?
Hello Scopefans,
#6 ist working in Germany, Europe.
Enter your email address to join: