- Joined
- Jan 9, 2013
- Messages
- 25,754
.........….it certainly would have livened up my days as a Boy Scout!
Or the Embryonic Journey to Manhood, Duncan?
.........….it certainly would have livened up my days as a Boy Scout!
After Spitfire, Freedom At Point Zero is my favourite Jefferson Starship
Yeah yeah yeah for sure Duncky great album niiiice...waiting for Marpow's verdict
I remember reading that when her daughter with Kantner, China, was young and in school, Grace baked brownies for fund raisers.
Hmm . . . would you eat Grace's brownies? <in my younger days, sure! lol>
It's possible the converter may have gotten a bit heavy-handed with the noise reduction. Or they're from 2nd or 3rd generation copies of the original reel. I personally don't collect quad reels (too expensive), but in my experience with the conversions they are not all created equally. Some sound as good as a professional DVD-A or SACD, yet others don't sound much better than Q8s.
I'm looking at my Dragon Fly Q8 conversion, and I just noticed an interesting anomaly. The waveform below is the song "Devil's Den", which is one of the better quad mixes on the album. It starts off with the violin/fiddle discrete in the fronts and then the rears kick in. The rears mostly mirror the fronts, but there are no drums and the bass guitar is much more prominent. Whoever mixed this one really wasn't using the quad format to its full potential, to say the least.
What's weird is that the right rear channel is unbelievably dull. It's like they copied the left rear channel over and ran it through some sort of extreme low-pass filter. Maybe I have a bad cart? I had a copy of Argent's In Deep Q8 that had a similar problem (all of program 2 was dulled to the point of being unlistenable).
View attachment 38259
Here's an MP3 of the first 30 seconds of the track, rear channels only. You an hear that the left side dominates because that's where all the high end is. Very odd.
Every Q8 of "Volunteers" I've had seems to have virtually the same problem. Right Rear is just incredibly dull and murky. I did have a conversion from Reel that wasn't so, but it almost seems like the engineer forgot he had a right rear channel to fill. Granted, there's something there to keep it from being a dead channel, but even when something does blast out, it's so dull you can barely tell. I thought my system had a bad channel.
Super Smart Steelydave, I just learned another thing.Murky rear right channel is much more likely a duplication issue rather than a lazy engineer - that kind of thing is the result of a record head on a tape deck (ie at the duplication facility) not being properly aligned with the tape. It doesn't affect the other channels so much, but with the rear right being physically the nearest to the edge of the tape, it doesn't have any oxide to record the high frequencies on to.
I have several Warner and Atlantic Q8's that exhibit this symptom as well.
Yes there were many Atlantic and Warner Q8 tapes with bad right rear channels. I went through so many back in the 70's just to get a good one.Super Smart
Murky rear right channel is much more likely a duplication issue rather than a lazy engineer - that kind of thing is the result of a record head on a tape deck (ie at the duplication facility) not being properly aligned with the tape. It doesn't affect the other channels so much, but with the rear right being physically the nearest to the edge of the tape, it doesn't have any oxide to record the high frequencies on to.
I have several Warner and Atlantic Q8's that exhibit this symptom as well.
Steelydave, I just learned another thing.
Enter your email address to join: