Bob Marley was not to my knowledge on Mercury Records.
Bob Marley was on Island Records. Weren't they distributed by Mercury in the states?
Bob Marley was not to my knowledge on Mercury Records.
Island bounced around from Warner / Atlantic, to Capitol, and over to Universal (when it was MCA). Mercury was a part of Polygram. Not seen any Poly related Marley.Bob Marley was on Island Records. Weren't they distributed by Mercury in the states?
Yes, those DV classical titles have inspired me to dig into the back catalog of Deutsche Grammophon on DVD-A and SACD to try and find any that are mixed in a more 4-corner quad style, and not the ambiance in rear channels style. I have a ton of classical works on LP and CD, and my music server has the flac encodes. But I am finding that I gravitate (mostly) to the Mercury Living Presence and RCA Living stereo stuff for those 3-channel mixes.
The newer DVD stuff from Columbia has me excited, and now I want more. There has to be some DG material from 2000 - 2004 issued discs (in true quad) of their back-catalog to dig into. I can do this while I am waiting for Sony Japan to come up with two more Santana quads and DV to come up with more of what they do best.
I'd get those Ohio Players in a heartbeat!I'm thinking with the new access to the Mercury Quads..... does that mean a reissue of The Ohio Players Fire & Honey in the near future?? I hope so. Perhaps even maybe delving in to see if any of the announced but unreleased titles exist? That could mean a couple of high-profile titles from Rod Stewart and Bob Marley.
Since Mercury/Phonogram are now part of Universal, could this mean UMG is open to the idea of DV releasing more of their multichannel material? They did allow a Capitol title, with the Helen Reddy disc. But if they do allow for more artists and titles to be released through DV, imagine what that could mean! More Moody Blues? More Elton John? More Who? It's mind-boggling!The licensing of the BTO quads may have to do with Randy Bachman, who has been agreeable to re-releasing anything from his long career. We'll see if any other Mercury/Phonogram artists get licensed.
Since Mercury/Phonogram are now part of Universal, could this mean UMG is open to the idea of DV releasing more of their multichannel material? They did allow a Capitol title, with the Helen Reddy disc. But if they do allow for more artists and titles to be released through DV, imagine what that could mean! More Moody Blues? More Elton John? More Who? It's mind-boggling!
Three words... Hall. And. Oates.
Hall and Oates had no quad albums.
Doesn't mean they couldn't be remixed, if the multitrack masters are still out there.Hall and Oates had no quad albums.
Outside of classical D-V hasn't done any remixing. I'd imagine they'd need a host of clearances that would make it extremely difficult. But...you never know?Doesn't mean they couldn't be remixed, if the multitrack masters are still out there.
No can do.I can go for that...
Outside of classical D-V hasn't done any remixing. I'd imagine they'd need a host of clearances that would make it extremely difficult. But...you never know?
The two Donald Byrd titles DV did were Blue Note records originally which was owned by Capitol and acquired by Universal.Since Mercury/Phonogram are now part of Universal, could this mean UMG is open to the idea of DV releasing more of their multichannel material? They did allow a Capitol title, with the Helen Reddy disc.
i think maybe DV commissioned a couple of Raiders tracks to be newly mixed into MultiCh by Mark Wilder at Sony NY for inclusion in their Raiders SACD 2-fer release?
steelydave will have the info
The two Donald Bryd titles DV did were Blue Note records originally which was owned by Capitol and acquired by Universal.
So there are more than a couple (at least 6 albums) of Universal titles which DV got for quad SACD reissue.
I heard that they are or were very disorganized and not easy to work with. But if DV got six titles for quad, then that's six titles for quad. We can expect more.
Enter your email address to join: