I must say I always thought Benny The Bouncer was the worst track of BSS.
By reading Keith Emerson's biography (pp.180-1), one gets the clear indication that "Lucky Man" is also a filler, at least considering Keith Emerson and Carl Palmer. Maybe even to Greg Lake "Lucky Man" was a filler. Lake said, in studio with E & P, according to Emerson, that it was "just a bit of fun" (p. 180).
I'm not talking about Mr. Wilson nor about any post from anyone else in particular, I'm just getting into the filler idea. So filler-wise, if we take that as an objective criterion, "Lucky Man", "Jeremy Bender", "Are You Ready Eddy?", "Benny The Bouncer", the entire "Works Volume 2" are fillers. And the list may grow: one could add "C'est la vie", "Tank" from Works 1, "Nutrocker", "Peter Gunn" and the entire Side A of "Love Beach" (I'd cut them all if I had to choose better tracks on their respective albums for any reason). And then, if one considers "Jeremy" and "Benny" fillers, then he/she will also say quite the same about "The Sheriff". And then the entire "saloon"/"old west" subgenre of ELP is erased from history (if "lesser" tracks are going to be ruled out).
Well, apparently, no classic album of ELP is completely safe from less ambitious tracks! Shall we bother to check "Black Moon" and "In The Hot Seat"?
I wonder if such a "filler band" like this really deserves any attention at all (LOL)!!!!. If Prog detractors (and I'm talking about guys like Lester Bangs, who understood ELP as deeply as I could grasp Milli Vanilli) used such a line of thought, ELP and others would be out of business maybe way before 1977!
I suspect that as high level as an album gets, bigger the chances are to have fillers appearing here and there. After all, isn't it a "relative" effect, that comes by comparison with the other tracks? Maybe it's easier to find fillers in bands like ELP than in 3-chord bands. Maybe everything that you put as a neighbor to Karn Evil 9 will sound like a filler. Maybe everything that is a neighbor to a Spice Girls' track in a compilation album will make it sound like a filler!
Also wonder if ELP is the only good band with that issue going on. I don't think so. It seems to me that taking risks sometimes is behind good but heterogenous albums.
I suppose (again, taking fillers as an objetive criterion): "More Fool Me" is a filler on "Selling England By The Pound" (Genesis), "Horizons" (it hurts me to even think about this!) a filler on "Foxtrot" (Genesis), "Cans and Brahms" and "We Have Heaven" fillers on "Fragile" (Yes).
Should these tracks have "special" treatment in the future because they're fillers? I guess not, and my only point here is that "filler" in itself, alone, with no other issues going on, is a dangerous concept.
But I see that's not the case in question! I can understand that with the ELP 2012 releases there were missing and rediscovered reels kind of pushing decisions (BTW, thank you, Steven Wilson, for the kind and detailed answer!). I just wouldn't like to see in the future "lesser tracks" being cut for no reason other than someone thinks they are lesser tracks. Again, I'm not talking about the upcoming ELP edition here, I'm talking about one day such decisions be in wrong hands. I'm worried about future editions, with other people envolved and with Corporations eagerer and eagerer to reinvent and re-release a catalogue with forceful "new" ideas.
By reading Keith Emerson's biography (pp.180-1), one gets the clear indication that "Lucky Man" is also a filler, at least considering Keith Emerson and Carl Palmer. Maybe even to Greg Lake "Lucky Man" was a filler. Lake said, in studio with E & P, according to Emerson, that it was "just a bit of fun" (p. 180).
I'm not talking about Mr. Wilson nor about any post from anyone else in particular, I'm just getting into the filler idea. So filler-wise, if we take that as an objective criterion, "Lucky Man", "Jeremy Bender", "Are You Ready Eddy?", "Benny The Bouncer", the entire "Works Volume 2" are fillers. And the list may grow: one could add "C'est la vie", "Tank" from Works 1, "Nutrocker", "Peter Gunn" and the entire Side A of "Love Beach" (I'd cut them all if I had to choose better tracks on their respective albums for any reason). And then, if one considers "Jeremy" and "Benny" fillers, then he/she will also say quite the same about "The Sheriff". And then the entire "saloon"/"old west" subgenre of ELP is erased from history (if "lesser" tracks are going to be ruled out).
Well, apparently, no classic album of ELP is completely safe from less ambitious tracks! Shall we bother to check "Black Moon" and "In The Hot Seat"?
I wonder if such a "filler band" like this really deserves any attention at all (LOL)!!!!. If Prog detractors (and I'm talking about guys like Lester Bangs, who understood ELP as deeply as I could grasp Milli Vanilli) used such a line of thought, ELP and others would be out of business maybe way before 1977!
I suspect that as high level as an album gets, bigger the chances are to have fillers appearing here and there. After all, isn't it a "relative" effect, that comes by comparison with the other tracks? Maybe it's easier to find fillers in bands like ELP than in 3-chord bands. Maybe everything that you put as a neighbor to Karn Evil 9 will sound like a filler. Maybe everything that is a neighbor to a Spice Girls' track in a compilation album will make it sound like a filler!
Also wonder if ELP is the only good band with that issue going on. I don't think so. It seems to me that taking risks sometimes is behind good but heterogenous albums.
I suppose (again, taking fillers as an objetive criterion): "More Fool Me" is a filler on "Selling England By The Pound" (Genesis), "Horizons" (it hurts me to even think about this!) a filler on "Foxtrot" (Genesis), "Cans and Brahms" and "We Have Heaven" fillers on "Fragile" (Yes).
Should these tracks have "special" treatment in the future because they're fillers? I guess not, and my only point here is that "filler" in itself, alone, with no other issues going on, is a dangerous concept.
But I see that's not the case in question! I can understand that with the ELP 2012 releases there were missing and rediscovered reels kind of pushing decisions (BTW, thank you, Steven Wilson, for the kind and detailed answer!). I just wouldn't like to see in the future "lesser tracks" being cut for no reason other than someone thinks they are lesser tracks. Again, I'm not talking about the upcoming ELP edition here, I'm talking about one day such decisions be in wrong hands. I'm worried about future editions, with other people envolved and with Corporations eagerer and eagerer to reinvent and re-release a catalogue with forceful "new" ideas.