It doesn't matter how you say it (or who says it) it is always an opinion. I'd like to think that we can say a few outrageous things from time to time without everybody jumping all over each other.
What are these 4? Seems like all the ones I liked came out.
So I guess I am wrong for saying that I think that these releases should/could have been better. Sorry. I will conform.
So I guess I am wrong for saying that I think that these releases should/could have been better. Sorry. I will conform.
my feelings are you're a "Lucky Man" if you love ELP and surround music!
So I guess I am wrong for saying that I think that these releases should/could have been better.
Then these must be Zombie releases. @:5 years after the so-called death of surround-sound we are still getting occasssional releases like these.
And that's a fact, Jack!There is an interview with Steven Wilson in the October issue of Sound & Vision in which he discusses his Tull and ELP mixes.
Horrible analogy to back up a valid point.would someone will go back to utilize horses after prolonged usage of cars?
thanks for the link. nice but i don't got this sentence "There’s a snobbery toward 44.1-kHz/16-bit; nothing but 96/24 will do now."
what is snobbery about refusing to accept 44.1/16 after being introduced to 96/24? difference between two of those is absolutely
obvious
The plain fact is, the audible differences in playback, such as may exist, are not obvious or readily demonstrated, once the usual placebo/sighted bias/mastering differences/level differences are accounted for. Recording and producing at 24 bits or more, is of course justifiable.
I like it that he confirms what I heard...
that the ELP multis were recorded superbly..and it shows!
Crystal clear sound!
Eddie was VERY ready!
Enter your email address to join: