Tchaikovsky 1812 overture SACD. Caution DSD Cannons!:yikes View attachment 16895 View attachment 16896
I wanted to own the Boston SACD but I've heard it sounds really bad..
That's ridiculous. I just played this and it sounds excellent. At least as good as anything MFSL or AF puts out. You will like it. I've got a bunch of these so if you want me to mail one out for you to audition let me know.
Be sure to play the speaker setup test. There's some little kids announcing the channels. Pretty cute.
That's ridiculous. I just played this and it sounds excellent. At least as good as anything MFSL or AF puts out. You will like it. I've got a bunch of these so if you want me to mail one out for you to audition let me know.
cupboy said:That's ridiculous. I just played this and it sounds excellent. At least as good as anything MFSL or AF puts out. You will like it. I've got a bunch of these so if you want me to mail one out for you to audition let me know.
The Boston SACD is "as good as anything Mobile Fidelity or Audio Fidelity puts out"? Not on my system.
But it is some pretty heavy metal. So you don't really expect a lot from it in the first place - regardless of format.
That's what you think heavy metal is? Are you serious? That's just classic '70s hard rock - and one of the best debut albums of all time.
That's what you think heavy metal is? Are you serious? That's just classic '70s hard rock - and one of the best debut albums of all time.
I'm talking about the sound quality of the SACD. It's definitely not "as good as anything Mobile Fidelity or Audio Fidelity puts out".
I'm talking about the sound quality of the SACD. It's definitely not "as good as anything Mobile Fidelity or Audio Fidelity puts out".
i'm not sure i'd even call it 'hard' rock....but definitely one of the best debut albums for sure...front to back
Yep, I'd bet that if one of them released that album today on SACD, it would sound much better for sure.
I think that was my very first dvd-a back in the day (around 2002)Just got this one today
Great sound quality; very annoying mix!!!!!!!!!
Drums in rear right channel, absolutely stupid choice. This is not a 4 track recording from the 60's. Ridiculous. Totally ruins it for me.
The drums aren't just in the right rear channel, they're stereo imaged between the front right and rear right channel, and the organ similarly on the left side. Seeing as they are basically an organ trio, I think they were trying to take the mixing style of some of the stereo organ trio records from the 60's (stuff like Jimmy Smith, Jack McDuff, Groove Holmes, etc.) and pulling everything around in to a horsehoe to make it 5.1. Yes, it's not the most satisfying mix ever, but if everything were mixed the same way, life would be pretty dull.
fwiw I really like the SACD.. a remix from the multi's would be a sure fire way you could improve on whats already out there.. MFSL wouldn't go down that road.. there have been rumours of a Quad mix and an unreleased 5.1 in the past so maybe AF could work their magic and get either one of those mixes out if they do indeed exist?
Enter your email address to join: