It's said that NFL football is a game of inches, but last night's battle turned out to be a game of angstrom units ( Å ), especially on that late bomb:
The Official QQ NFL Tailgate Thread
- Thread starter gene_stl
- Start date
Help Support QuadraphonicQuad:
was it measure or time ? I think it was a nano not an angstrom
Misses by an Å are often due to being off by a ns.
Do you know that one nanosecond is to a second as a second is 31.71 years? Had this happened in a Super Bowl, Valdes-Scantling would be re-living that moment for 31.71 years...and then some.
Last edited:
The JinxMaster has lost his touch. Or is it Kelce?? How do ya blow a whole second half? Remember all the times the Chiefs tread water in the first half & take over in the later half? Those were the good 'ol days.
But a shout out & congrats to ar surround, John N, Bill B, & LMQ. Looks like you placed your faith rightly.
But a shout out & congrats to ar surround, John N, Bill B, & LMQ. Looks like you placed your faith rightly.
What a F'ed up game. Anybody could have beat the Chiefs last night. Never seen so many dropped balls.
Yes, most definitely.
What is remarkable is that the Chiefs beat the Jets by only 3 points. Even more remarkable is that the Eagles lost to the Jets. I'm scratching my head here.
Bill B was correct. Never count out the under dog - especially if its a divisional game
Yes, I say that also. But the Chiefs, Eagles and Jets are all in different divisions.
no specifics --just the general uncertainty. Ill use Detroit vs SanDiego as an example. Detroit should have won and won big. Instead they were lucky to win
One more thing...Go Vikings!Duh, Bears. nuff said. lol
Take the Vikings -3.5
https://www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/n...k-for-monday-night-football-vs-chicago-bears/
You have obviously not watched many Ravens games. LOL
And my picking the Eagles had nothing to do with faith in them, it all had to do with what would be best for my team. If I were betting $$$ even up, I'd have probably taken the Chiefs if only because they were the home team.
Ah what the hell. We even lost to the Lions with a home field advantage. Even that seems to be of no use.You have obviously not watched many Ravens games. LOL
And my picking the Eagles had nothing to do with faith in them, it all had to do with what would be best for my team. If I were betting $$$ even up, I'd have probably taken the Chiefs if only because they were the home team.
Last edited:
Imbobman
1K Club - QQ Shooting Star
Dang your like an Encyclopedia Bobmannica.
"I look at a lot of players like Ray Lewis and Rodney Harrison and Ronnie Lott and guys that impacted the game in a certain way, and every hit they would've made would have been a penalty [now]," Brady said"
LOL ... Some would argue he had a large part in that. IMO he was the one that whined the most (and I don't necessarily blame him) about the quarterback being protected from hard hits. For him to make that observation now that it's behind him is more than ironic.
@Imbobman ---okay bobman, pony up to the bar and lets talk about tomorrow's game. whatcha thinking ? RickyPicks has an opinion ( he is STILL boasting about his call on the Lions - Bears game ) Ive got my thoughts. RickyPicks says that the Lions offense will finally run and pass effectively. Defense will play well. And the final will be 31-10 Lions. I say Lions continue to struggle defensively on the pass rush and GB will be pass happy due to running back injuries. Lions 24 Packers 17. You ? Anyone else ? note to JohnN - please - no prediction from you
Similar threads
- Sticky
