I haven’t got the disc yet and I’m sure being in Canada I won’t be seeing it anytime soon. According to Paul’s comments on the SDE page, this is not a dedicated 5.1 mix so the fold-down should be exactly the same.
If it is a fold-down however, it begs the question on why it was included in the first place.
Thanks for the heads-up about this,
@bookofsaturdays.
If anyone's curious, Paul's comment is under the Into The Gap unboxing video on the SDE page:
"This wasn’t a dedicated 5.1 so just to stress the Atmos in 5.1 is the same as what is ‘missing’."
So, as someone who doesn't have the means or interest to expand into Atmos, the whole reason I've bought the SDE releases that I have is to support the continued creation of dedicated 5.1 mixes. And I've always assumed the 5.1s on what I've bought are dedicated, because the advertising has given no reason to believe otherwise.
I wouldn't have bought Into The Gap if I'd known the 5.1 was just a folddown. And this makes me wonder if I've been similarly misled about any of the previous releases I've bought or the upcoming stuff I've pre-ordered.
(As far as what I have -- I assume the Steven Wilson 5.1 mixes on The Hurting and The Lexicon Of Love are dedicated, since he's traditionally started with 5.1 as a basis for his Atmos mixing. But, since it turns out the David Kosten 5.1 of Into The Gap is just a folddown, how about his 5.1 of No Parlez? How about Bob Clearmountain's 5.1s on the upcoming Simple Minds Blu-Rays?)
I'm really really rethinking my support of SDE in the wake of all this. And don't get me wrong -- I'm happy for those who are approaching these releases completely from an Atmos standpoint. But, that's not me. And if there's not clarity and transparency about these 5.1 mixes, then I can't take any further chances with their product.
And I just need to throw in a hearty agreement with
@SeeMoreDigital: an Atmos folddown will never be the same as a dedicated 5.1.